You need protection from wireless frequencies (EMF)!

Axis:Image: 

GreenTech Interview with Christian Sea Perkins, CFA, NanotechFuel.com

1. What types of hazards are people contributing to everyday?

Depending on how green they are, they may be reducing their carbon footprint. Otherwise, the hazards are so many, I would need hours to compile. Expending toxic emissions into the air driving to and fro, expending dangerous electromagnetic waves by carrying and worse, using a cell phone that is not equipped with 100% counter measures.

Eating so many chemicals it is more difficult for the body to function each day.

Eating meat contributes greatly to the carbon emissions.

Using toxic chemicals in virtually all daily and sleeping activities.

Converting to organic / botanical would greatly reduce MCS multiple chemical sensitivity and medical bills.

The toxic spillage into our rivers, lakes and oceans are paralyzing our marine life and natural resources.

The complete disregard toward nature, the glut and laziness are destroying earth as we or our ancestors knew it.

The results of exposure are anything from compromised immune system to death, again a list far too long to type but would be happy to record if you still don’t wish to speak.

2. How damaging is eSmog to humans and plants and what are the sources?

Extremely, severity linked to every phone having an antenna inside, always searching for the closest tower and going through the web of bodies all doing the same. Think about walking down the street in NYC or riding the trains or in the planes where WiFi is and the frequencies bouncing through you the entire way. The School Children is what I am most concerned about Willi. We ‘brag’ on how brilliant they will become having access to the wireless internet which is precisely what is frying their brains. Our future Leaders deserve so much better.

Sources, all electronics indoors and out, wireless far worse, power lines, etc. All these frequencies operate outside the range of living matter, hence, compromise the cells and how they interact.
Human studies have taken precedence to house pets, farm animals, bees, then plants and production. Many studies globally turn to EMF as causing such a fast decline in the bee population (acres of hives disappearing overnight only to learn a new WiFi or WiMax tower went live). Cows that refuse to graze under power lines even when it is the richest for them. The stories go on as does the ever increasing devastation.

How damaging: primarily brain tumors, autism, ADHD, stillborns and premature dementia and Alzheimer’s. See EMF Journal. I’ve also posted the 1 hr 45 minute Congressional hearing which took place last month here in the US. We are 10-20 years behind the other 12 countries that already impose bans on cell phones, laptops for children and pregnant women.

3. Have communities successfully stopped large EMF radiation projects?

Small communities - How? Protesting, legislating against, picket lines, rally’s but most effective is petitioning Congress or equivalent in other countries. The WHO World Health Organization is scheduled to release the very first 10 year study of the cause and effect of cell phone use and cancer. These low level frequencies over time cause great damage. Consider asbestos, coal mining and tobacco industries; these took upward to 40 years to put a cancer label on them. Well, the US has used it for weaponry for that long now.

4. How do the new Nanotechnology fuel additives work?

It is a 5,000:1 ratio. The eeFuel additive emulsifies all ingredients in the tank (including whatever percentage of water, ethanol, and other filler) so it all burns. Result, higher MPG because of the gentle cleaning process removing the carbon and gum buildup and residue. The parts operate in optimum conditions. The higher combustion, cooler running engine and increased performance REDUCE expense and greatly REDUCE toxic emissions into the air. Including the most toxic poison NOx and other particulates up to 50%. More at NanotechFuel.com. Click on the eeFuel tab, go to HOW IT WORKS MOVIE for demonstration. Here are ample data to support these claims including over two decades of carbon emissions reduction throughout the Pacific Rim and 20 billion miles without one damage claim. All forms of transportation including freight liners, RR and cruise ships.

Using both eeFuel® into the fuel tank and eeLube® in the crankcase as companion products effectively clean the top and bottom of the engine; ultimate emissions reduction and miles / hours are increased. Lawn maintenance, watercraft and motorcycles see the results the quickest (don’t have as large of an engine to clean up).

5. How do you define carbon footprint? This is your primary criteria set?

I define carbon footprint as the amount of metric tons of Smog and eSmog sent into the atmosphere and hovering in the air we breathe. This is in comparison to the amount sent up prior to WWI. Industrialization did not take these factors into consideration, the Scientists did and the Politicians ignored it. Hence we now have the worst obesity, medical issues and most damaged environment ever. Yes the population has grown but not all countries did it smart. You don’t need a crystal ball to estimate the potential damage vs benefits.

6. Are you painting a picture of technology vs. technology here?!

Absolutely.

Connections:

Christian Sea Perkins, CFA
NanotechFuel.com
Csea at 4nha dot com
407.374.6075